Is It True That EPS Doesn't Have "Porn" In Their Libraries/Curriculum?

Apparently, it depends upon what you consider pornographic. If it's unobscured sex as in a pornographic film - NO, EPS DOESN'T have 'porn' in their libraries. 

If it's written material that graphically describes a boy being raped by another older boy - YES, EPS DOES have 'porn' in their libraries. 

Would you want your Sophomore being read the word "c#nt" in class? What about a minor Sophomore student reading the following passage? 

“I felt Stanley’s hand creeping onto my thigh. I looked at him, but he was staring at the Hee Haw Honeys so intently that I couldn’t be sure he was doing it on purpose, so I knocked his hand away without saying anything. A few minutes later, the hand came creeping back. I looked down and saw that Uncle Stanley’s pants were unzipped and he was playing with himself. I felt like hitting him, but I was afraid I’d get in trouble the way Lori had after punching Erma, so I hurried out to Mom. ‘Mom, Uncle Stanley is behaving inappropriately,’ I said. ‘Oh, you’re probably imagining it,’ she said. ‘He groped me! And he’s wanking off!’ Mom cocked her head and looked concerned. ‘Poor Stanley,’ she said. ‘He’s so lonely.’”

Or this? “Assef knelt behind Hassan, put his hands on Hassan’s hips and lifted his bare buttocks. He kept one hand on Hassan’s back and undid his own belt buckle with his free hand. He unzipped his jeans. Dropped his underwear. He positioned himself behind Hassan. Hassan didn’t struggle. Didn’t even whimper.” 

What if the teacher read this passage in class? “He handed his cigarette to the guy next to him, made a circle with the thumb and index finger of one hand. Poked the middle finger of his other hand through the circle. Poked it in and out. In and out. ‘I knew your mother, did you know that? I knew her real good. I took her from behind by the creek over there.’ The soldiers laughed. One of them made a squealing sound. I told Hassan to keep walking, keep walking. ‘What a tight little sugary cunt she had!’ the soldier was saying, shaking hands with the others, grinning.” 

Find more information about the "non-pornographic" books being used for REQUIRED CURRICULUM, here: https://www.edmonddidyouknow.com/book-summaries

Find the full video here on 

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQoY7NPoePc

and here on Rumble  https://rumble.com/v4g2z39-rope-report-live-jenni-and-michael-talk-edmond-public-schools-refusal-to-di.html

A 2017 Letter To Edmond Public Schools From A Parent About The Glass Castle and Kite Runner

In 2017, a parent discovered that her 10th grade daughter was being required to read The Kite Runner for her English class - and that her daughter's teacher had read parts of the book aloud in class, teaching her daughter a word she didn't have in her vernacular previously, and one of which the mother didn't approve. 

She is not the first parent who has complained about two of the books that have been required reading for 10th grade English class for numerous years. In fact, many parents have followed the chain of command up through administrators to express their irritation and frustration over the fact that these books have been assigned to kids barely even 16 years of age, believing that they are not developmentally appropriate reading for high school aged students. 

Most parents believe that their child's school would never REQUIRE their kids to read something of which they wouldn't approve, but many - like this parent - are naive and don't check into the books their kids are reading. 

To see the full video on this topic, 

see YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdK_05IxxLE

and Rumble - https://rumble.com/v4g2z39-rope-report-live-jenni-and-michael-talk-edmond-public-schools-refusal-to-di.html

Edmond Public Schools Superintendent Explains Her Priorities - And They're NOT Students

In a video posted to Facebook and on the district's website, Dr. Angela Grunwald, Superintendent of EPS, explains how it is that she will protect her district using taxpayer-paid attorneys to petition the Supreme Court to stop EPS from having their accreditation downgraded because they are refusing to remove two books from the curriculum. 

The books are the Kite Runner and The Glass Castle - books that are required reading in the 10th grade English curriculum - that parents have been complaining about since 2014 (that we know about). 

Why would a Superintendent use tax dollars to prevent the removal of two books from the curriculum after years of complaints from parents? Because, as she explains in this video, Superintendent Grunwald prioritizes "moving EPS forward" and "the district" above the well-being of students - and certainly their parents. 

See the full video here on YouTube and here on Rumble.

Dear Parents, Books Like "The Glass Castles" - And Worse - Have Been In Public Schools For Years - We Need To Get Them Out Now

 

I have to say, I'm more than mildly happy to read that parents have finally discovered the disgusting books being foisted upon their children in public schools and metropolitan libraries all across the nation - including Oklahoma - yes, "of all places" - but I have to say, I'm more than mildly frustrated that we've been trying to alert parents to this phenomena for over 10 years and not gotten much traction.