I thought I would publish the remarks I made to the House Rules and Reference Committee this week in the event it might help someone in another state. Please feel free to use/modify anything you see here if it will help.
COMMON CORE TESTIMONY: Ohio State Legislature 8/20/14
Jenni White, President: Restore Oklahoma Public Education
As Oklahoma began the effort to repeal Common Core in our state,
we were confronted with numerous reasons (created mostly by think tanks and
dues-paid organizations – some outside our state borders) why we should not
repeal Common Core and develop our own standards. I’m sure you’ve heard numerous of these
yourselves. I’m going to attempt to discuss
a few this morning.
1.
Our state Chamber of Commerce
pushed numerous false claims indicating that Common Core was better than
Oklahoma’s previous standards (PASS) and that Common Core were ‘proven’
standards.
a.
They put together several mailers pointing to the ‘fact’ that
Kentucky had seen higher results from using Common Core
b.
Dick Innes from the Bluegrass Policy Institute in Kentucky, was
able to provide all the information I needed to show that the Chamber was,
according to Innes, making “outrageously wrong” claims about Common Core. (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-oklahoma-chamber-of-commerce-makes.html)
c.
False information will be used to attempt to sway public opinion;
it can and should be debunked.
d.
It’s also important to remember that the US Chamber of Commerce
was given a tidy sum by the Bill Gates Foundation to push/message the Common
Core.
2.
The Fordham Institute
frequently attempted to provide our legislature with ‘proof’ that Common Core
were better than Oklahoma’s standards, though Fordham actually graded
Oklahoma’s PASS as an A- in Math and a B+ in English in comparison to Common
Core.
a.
When we addressed this issue, we were told Fordham had graded an
earlier version of PASS, not the current version.
i. Consequently, we had Dr.
Stotsky and Dr. Wurman both review the latest PASS in comparison to Common Core
and both were in agreement that even the most recent PASS were at least equal
to Common Core. (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/05/this-week-is-important-in-life-of.html)
3.
Oklahoma was constantly assailed by allegations that Oklahoma
would lose our NCLB waiver should we
repeal Common Core. We were able to make
several cogent arguments against this prevailing theory.
a.
First of all – if any state is in danger of losing their NCLB
waiver for repealing Common Core, how can Common Core be a ‘state-led’
issue? In fact, that one query
invalidates this often used claim and should, therefore, be a major talking
point for repeal.
b.
If the waiver is the issue, the ‘assurance’ made to the federal
government in the waiver is that the state’s standards be “college and
career-ready”. There is a provision for
states not signing on to Common Core, to use their higher ed/career tech system
to validate the state’s current standards – certifying them as “college and
career-ready”. Oklahoma is undergoing
this process currently.
c.
The state of Washington lost their waiver due to an inability to
come together over their teacher grading system. After speaking with Liv Finne with the
Washington Policy Institute, parents are finding they have more flexibility to
get those students who need it, help in reading, as the state must give the
money to the parents to find appropriate programs to help their children. (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/05/does-our-state-want-museum-or-education.html)
d.
No state will LOSE MONEY with a loss of their waiver. They only
lose the ability to direct 20% of their Title 1 funding. In Oklahoma, we found this amounts to only
0.50% of total education spending. A
percent of a percent would be the loss – not of money, but of DIRECTION of
money.
e.
NCLB
waivers are crumbling as states discover they are losing more and more of their
autonomy in state education to the federal government in exchange for
flexibility from a law that demanded 100% proficiency of American children in
math and reading – a pie-in-the-sky ideal if ever there was one. Many states other than WA have had to abandon
‘vital’ parts of their NCLB waiver for one reason or another, and several
didn’t even take a waiver. It is nearly
impossible for the US Department of Education to seek reckoning from all the
states which have desired to, or had to, buck their waiver.
i. CA did not get a waiver –
though several districts have – but they say they’re happy to having to satisfy
federal regulations for school turnarounds, teacher evaluations and
standards. In addition, Vermont and
North Dakota didn’t take a waiver because they said they wanted more
flexibility over their spending and policy.
ii. In fact, Margaret
Spellings, an architect of the original NCLB law under George W. Bush, has
said, “The Waivers were a mistake. It’s
a crazy quilt of a system which I think will die [on its] own.” (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/05/hb3399-why-are-we-arguing-over-percent.html)
4.
In a last ditch effort to stop Oklahoma from repealing Common
Core, the Fordham Institute sent a letter to Governor Fallin and the members of
our legislators addressing a wide range of topics – all of which we refuted for
legislators, but I’d like to address two quickly (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/06/response-to-brickman-fordham-and.html)
a.
The Fiscal and Educational
Costs of Repeal: Common Core costs have
largely been left unmentioned. In fact,
I was not able to find record of associated costs in any state prior to the
fact. I just performed a recent search
on the topic and found that the National Conference of State Legislators doesn’t know. Governing magazine doesn’t know. In fact,
Oklahoma’s own legislators couldn’t have known what it would cost to implement
the CCSS because they were passed into state law before they were even fully
written and prepared for public view. You
can’t estimate cots of an initiative for which you’re not fully familiar, yet
now cost has become an issue to prevent repeal?
A number of organizations provided reasonable estimates early
on in the process – one researcher even adapted these for each state - but they
got very little discussion time – as though it seemed easier to just ignore the
thought and see if it would go away. In Oklahoma, Representative Gus
Blackwell attempted to bring a
Task Force to bear for study of the costs of Common Core in Oklahoma during the
2013 legislative session, but that bill was blocked from a hearing on the floor
after passing the rules committee resoundingly, seeming to indicate that the
answer to the question wasn’t really an issue.
b.
A Political Advantage with
Most Voters: A new poll has apparently shown four star
Republican voters are for CCSS, but the questions in the poll don’t ask, “How
do you feel about the Common Core State Standards?” they ask, “How do you feel
about higher standards?” Only the most out of touch policy wonks
could spin that inquiry to mean Common Core specifically. The candidates for 2014 office who have
commissioned polls on Common Core in Oklahoma have reported to me results
showing nearly nil public support for CC. Though our Secretary of
Education may be out explaining to the public that white suburban moms are mad because we’ve found our kids aren’t as
brilliant as we think they are, most parents WANT higher standards for their
children. Moms all over Oklahoma – and
the nation –are prepared to vote like they may never have voted before simply
because they’ve watched their children cry over homework and become more and
more frustrated with the whole notion of school. Polls don’t catch these
voters – these are wildcard votes spurred by emotional voters that only want to
see the best for their children.
i. A
new Gallup/Phi Delta Kappa poll has been released that indicates much more
opposition for Common Core than previously.
In fact, 60% of respondents oppose CC because they think it will limit
the way teachers teach. Partisan
opposition breakdown: R=76%, I=60% and D = 38%
5. We’ve often been told that
we can only compare students if states
have the same educational standards, but doesn’t it seem at least plausible
that people in their own states would best know that definition of a ‘right’
education for their own state? If not, then why have states at all? Why don’t
we just open up all borders and allow every state to be ruled by one central
government that knows the best definition of ‘right’ for the entire country?
6. The argument has also been
made that Common Core repeal is political
– that policymakers are trying to stop Common Core because of pressure from
opponents. This one notion should
probably be most offensive to everyone involved because I think it points to a
certain amount of derision for the regular citizen. Somehow, parents have become ‘opponents’ –
saboteurs – reactionaries. In fact, this
argument seems to undercut the notion of personal liberty by indicating
parents/citizens are not smart enough to understand that the state knows what’s
best for us.
7. Accountability has been another issue used to denounce state
standards in favor of Common Core, but the truth is that the only ones to whom ANY school needs to
prove educational relevance and accountability are those parents and students
actually served by that school in that community. That was the greatest notion
in all the ideals during the creation of America – the fact that no one was
going to have the definition of ‘right’ for any state or individual. That the
individual first, and then the state, had the best idea of ‘right’. (http://restoreoklahomapubliceducation.blogspot.com/2014/05/whats-fight-against-common-core-really.html)
In closing, no matter
what argument we faced for keeping Common Core in Oklahoma, we were able to
debunk every single concrete, factual argument (as in the Kentucky issue with
the Chamber) and provide sufficient ideological argument to refute any
political or philosophical complaint. If
that can happen in Oklahoma, it can certainly happen in Ohio. There is no magic “Common Core bullet”. Ohio – like Oklahoma - has your own unique
arsenal for educational excellence; you just need to arm yourself with what
works for you, aim and fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment